Prove Your Framework
The work was submitted. It was blocked, removed, desk-rejected. So now it's public. This page is where the challenge lives. Every invitation issued. Every response received. Every silence logged. In full public view.
Where the Work Was Blocked
LFT was submitted through the standard channels of academic publishing and preprint archiving. Across multiple platforms, the work was restricted, removed, or desk-rejected without technical engagement. This is the record of those actions. The underlying physics is untouched by any of them — every paper remains openly available on Zenodo.
Submission was made through the standard EPJ channel. The work was returned without technical review and the submitting account was subsequently blocked from further submissions. No substantive objection to the physics was provided.
The work was posted on Qeios through its standard open-access submission flow. After publication it was removed from the platform. The platform explicitly advertises open post-publication review as its core value proposition; the removal occurred without formal peer-review commentary.
Submitted through the APS portal. Returned as a desk rejection — the editorial filter applied before any peer review occurs. Desk rejections at PRD are routine, but the absence of any engagement with a framework claiming to resolve 110 foundational problems at zero free parameters is precisely the kind of decision this public record exists to document.
Submission was blocked through Research Square's intake screening. Research Square is a preprint server — by design, the barrier to posting should be extremely low. The block was applied without substantive engagement with the content.
Author identity verification was refused on the grounds that the submitting author does not possess an institutional email address. The work itself was never evaluated. Independent researchers without institutional affiliation cannot pass Figshare's author-verification step regardless of the work's content — a structural barrier that silently excludes entire categories of contributors.
This Is No Longer About Disproving This Framework. It Is About Proving Yours.
Rolling invitations are issued to physicists, researchers, and institutions worldwide. The request is simple: resolve the same foundational problems — ultraviolet divergences, vacuum-energy scaling, the proton radius puzzle, quantum gravity, dimensional consistency, mass origin — without contradiction, without patching, and without inserting parameters to force agreement. If your framework holds, show it. If it does not, that will be visible. And if engagement is avoided, delayed, or suppressed, that will be visible too.
Issue a Public Challenge
Fill in the recipient, the method, and the content of the challenge. Clicking "Prepare Email" will open your mail client with the challenge pre-populated. Clicking "Log to Record" will add the challenge to the public log below. Both actions happen locally in your browser — the log persists on this device until a backend is connected.
Challenge Record
Every challenge issued is logged here. Every response received — and every silence — becomes part of the permanent record. Use the buttons on each row to update the status as outcomes unfold. This list persists in your browser until a shared backend is connected.
| Date | Recipient | Institution | Method | Status | Actions |
|---|
Engagement, Not Presentation
This platform will host live public sessions. Not talks. Not Q&As dressed as discourse. Engagement. Each session takes place in full public view, is recorded, and becomes part of the permanent archive. Invitations are issued on a rolling basis.
Scheduled sessions and live streams will appear here. When a session goes live, the embed (YouTube / StreamYard) will activate in this panel.