Pre-Registered · Time-Bound · Falsifiable
If It Fails, It Fails.
LFT stakes itself on the following predictions. Each one is time-stamped, published in advance through Zenodo, and evaluated against the next generation of experimental data. Agreement with standard theoretical models refutes LFT in the corresponding regime. Systematic deviations consistent with the predictions below support it. There is no ambiguity.
The Kill Condition
One Theory. Four Experiments. No Retreat.
A framework that cannot fail is not a framework. LFT exposes itself to four independent experimental windows. Each prediction follows from a single mechanism — dimensional crossover driving the effective spacetime dimension from four in the infrared toward two in the ultraviolet — with no additional assumptions, no free parameters, no adjustable knobs. If any of these windows closes on a null result, the corresponding branch of the theory is invalidated in that regime, and the author will say so publicly.
Falsifiability — stated in advance
LISA
If gravitational-wave strain amplitudes match General Relativity templates within detector precision, with no systematic low-frequency suppression, the LISA branch of LFT is refuted.
HL-LHC
If high-energy scattering cross-sections match Standard Model scaling at multi-TeV with no deviation, the high-energy branch is refuted.
Euclid / DESI
If large-scale structure growth matches ΛCDM across all scales, the cosmological branch is refuted.
Engineering
If identical inputs always produce identical outputs regardless of connectivity structure, the applied-systems branch is refuted.
Live Countdowns
The Predictions
Each prediction card shows the experiment, the LFT prediction, the standard prediction it deviates from, the observable signature, and a live countdown to the expected evaluation window. These dates are drawn from the published Predictions paper and are fixed in advance.
01
LISA Gravitational-Wave Suppression
Laser Interferometer Space Antenna · mHz regime
Decisive
LFT predicts
Systematic amplitude suppression of gravitational-wave strain at low frequencies, scaling with the effective dimension deviation. The suppression grows toward the lowest LISA band near 10⁻⁴ Hz.
Standard GR predicts
No systematic amplitude deviation across the LISA band.
Observable signature
Consistent negative amplitude residuals relative to GR waveform templates, exceeding experimental uncertainty, with increasing deviation at lower frequencies.
Launch window
Expected 2035
—days —hrs —min
02
HL-LHC Cross-Section Suppression
High-Luminosity LHC · multi-TeV scattering
Active
LFT predicts
Scattering cross-sections exhibit systematic suppression relative to Standard Model expectations at the highest accessible energies, driven by the effective dimensional flow.
Standard Model predicts
Cross-sections continue to follow established 4D scaling with no suppression.
Observable signature
Reduced cross-sections at multi-TeV scales and deviations from expected running behavior, visible in Run 3 analyses and the HL-LHC program.
HL-LHC first physics
Expected 2029
—days —hrs —min
03
Euclid / DESI Growth-Rate Deviation
Cosmological large-scale structure · 10–10³ Mpc
Active
LFT predicts
Small but systematic, scale-dependent deviations in the growth rate f(z) of cosmological structure, driven by connectivity dynamics modifying effective gravitational behavior at the largest scales.
ΛCDM predicts
Growth rate f(z) consistent across scales, matching the standard ΛCDM template.
Observable signature
Systematic, non-random residuals in growth rate measurements with a scale-dependent pattern, visible in Euclid and DESI data releases through 2024–2026 and beyond.
Key data releases
Rolling — through 2027
—days —hrs —min
04
Engineering — Identical Inputs, Different Outputs
Proprietary test platforms · laboratory scale
Ongoing
LFT predicts
Output varies under identical inputs when connectivity structure is altered. Four test platforms are in active development: Inertial Load Redistribution (ILRS/AIIC), Eigenmode-Structured Communication (ESCC), Resonant Energy Redistribution (RERC), and Adaptive Propagation Field systems (APFR).
Standard expectation
Output is determined solely by the magnitude of the input — identical inputs must produce identical outputs regardless of system organization.
Observable signature
Reproducible cases in which two identical input signals, delivered to the same hardware under the same conditions, produce measurably different outputs after the connectivity structure has been altered.
First documented results
Ongoing — through 2026
—days —hrs —min
Pre-Registration
Time-Stamped in Advance
The Predictions paper is archived on Zenodo with a permanent DOI. The predictions above are those of the published version at the time of archival and are fixed as of that date. They are intended to be evaluated against future experimental results without modification. That is the entire point of pre-registration: no moving goalposts. No retrofitting.
Document
Pre-Registered Experimental Predictions for Near-Term Tests
Statistical criterion
Persistence across independent datasets · magnitude exceeding systematic uncertainty · consistent directional bias